Mamacita says: If one person offers to make popcorn for another person, and that other person declines the offer, and the first person says “Are you sure? I’m making popcorn and I’d be glad to make some for you, too,” and the second person insists he doesn’t want any, and the first person gives up and says “Fine,” and goes on to make some popcorn for herself, and the second person smells it and comes upstairs and puts his hand in SOMEONE ELSE’S POPCORN and helps himself to a big fistful of it, I am of the opinion that a sharp fork in that second person’s hand is not out of line.
Warning: proceed no further if you’re one of those overly sensitive types who is easily offended. You’re no fun, by the way.
==
Mamacita says: Grammar. I love grammar. It’s such a fantastic segue to. . . well, pretty much anything.
A student once asked me if it was true that a person could go to hell for saying “shit.” (Not as a noun; as a statement of emotion.)
(It’s an interjection, set off by a comma or an exclamation point, so he really wasn’t too much off topic, and apparently it was on his mind.)
He said that his preacher had told him that he was going to hell because he said ’shit.’ I was more than a little bit flabbergasted, for a variety of reasons.
One, I’m still not used to adult students who say ’shit’ a lot and I don’t have to give them detention or pretend to be shocked.
Two, someone in a position of authority in this kid’s life has scared the shit OUT of him, for saying shit. So much so that this quiet well-behaved kid (who apparently has a potty mouth in church) asked his college instructor if it were true.
I have no desire to enter into any kind of debate with this boy’s preacher. I already dislike the guy too much. Neither is it my place to talk religious doctrine to my students.
But I do know a lot about shit. I had two babies, remember? And I taught in the public school system for a long, long time. I’m not really sure which of the two had the worst shit. I think probably the schools. When it comes to shit, the non-organic kind is always worse; it sticks to your heart for a long, long time, whereas we can scrape the organic kind off the bottoms of our shoes. Or walk it off; it depends on where you already are and where you’re going. The organic kind can be removed; the non-organic kind can’t.
So I explained to him that some people believed that being profane was a sin, but even so, ’shit’ is not a profanity, it’s an obscenity, so going to hell isn’t part of the package. The commandments are about profanity, not obscenity.
He was really relieved. He’ll probably also continue to say shit in the preacher’s presence. If my preacher was that stupid, I probably would, too.
I mean, honestly, a minister should know the difference between obscenity and profanity. They are not the same thing. Not a bit. Get a clue, preach. Then maybe he would refer to you as his “minister” instead of as a ‘preacher.’ There’s a big difference between THOSE two words, too.
We also discussed the word “condemn,” its presence in the chapter today being perfection on a stick, and going right along with the student’s question, because to condemn someone is also a profanity. We’ve watered down the word, but its point of origin was pithy and terrible.
I wanted to tackle “awesome” and “awful,” but we ran out of time. Next week, dear students. Mark your calendars; it’ll be awesome.
When I finally got home tonight, I was too tired to do any cleaning; this devastated me as those of you who know me can attest. The cats were sitting in my chair, as I discovered when I sat on them and they scratched me. Well, who could blame them? Talk about intruding on an already-claimed space.
It hurt. I might have said ’shit,’ too. I had no witnesses, so you’ll never know.
Mamacita says: This day used to be known as Armistice Day, in honor of the armistice that was signed on the “eleventh hour of the eleventh day of the eleventh month”. This year, 2010, marks the 93rd anniversary of Armistice Day.
This term also refers to the fact that back in ancient times, a worker who was hired at the eleventh hour of a twelve-hour workday was paid the same as those who had worked all twelve hours.
After World War II, Armistice Day was changed to Veterans’ Day. Many people do not realize that this is an international holiday, observed by many other nations as well as by the United States.
Schools do not teach students much about World War I, and I have never really understood why. Most social studies classes, unless it’s a specialized elective, study the Civil War (Frankly, my dear, I don’t give a damn) and then make a giant leap over everything else so they can briefly mention World War II (Hitler was bad) and then leap again and remind students that JFK was assassinated (“I am the man who accompanied Jacqueline Kennedy to Paris”) (“I am a jelly doughnut!”) all just in time for summer vacation. I learned most of what I know about World War I from reading L.M. Montgomery’s Rilla of Ingleside, and yes, it’s another Anne book; this one is mostly about Anne and Gilbert’s daughter Rilla. I cry every time I read it, even though I know what’s going to happen. You’ll cry, too. This book was written eighteen years before Anne of Ingleside, which takes place when the children are very young and was was sort of “inserted” into the list of Anne books, but that’s all right. I would imagine, though, that at the time the books were being written and published, that might have been confusing to readers. Anne of Ingleside has an ominous vision in it, that comes true in Rilla of Ingleside. I have not been able to re-read Anne of Ingleside ever since I realized this.
L.M. Montgomery is one of my favorite authors.
Which of her characters are you? I’m, ironically, Jane of Lantern Hill, which is another of my favorite books. If you aren’t familiar with these titles, my goodness, get yourself to the library right away. This is unacceptable! Anne might be Montgomery’s best-known heroine, but there are many others! I think my ultimate favorite Montgomery heroine is Emily; her story is told in a lovely trilogy that thrills me to the core.
Ahem. Sorry. In any lesson, often the tangents are more interesting and teach us more than the actual lesson.
On this day, let us honor the men and women who keep us safe, both past and present.
I’m not a Clinton fan, neither him nor her, but I do like this quotation by him: “There is nothing wrong with America that cannot be cured by what is right with America.”
I also like this one by Calvin Coolidge: “The issues of the world must be met and met squarely. The forces of evil do not distain preparation, they are always prepared and always preparing… The welfare of America, the cause of civilization will forever require the contribution, of some part of the life, of all our citizens, to the natural, the necessary, and the inevitable demand for the defense of the right and the truth.”
And I’ll end this post with this one, by FDR: “When you see a rattlesnake poised to strike, you do not wait until he has struck before you crush him.”
God bless America.
Mamacita says: I’ve been thinking about my father today. I have no idea why. There must have been something that started the thought process – something I saw, heard, ate, felt, laughed at. . . SOMETHING that made me think of him. Right now, though, nothing comes to mind. I’m just thinking about him.
So, I brought this old post out of retirement.
====
My father died several years ago, a long, slow, drawn-out process that left my mother and my siblings and I drained and sad, and grateful when the final ending finally ended. I loved my father, with all his faults, and charms, and whimsicalities, and more faults, and understanding, and lack of understanding, and singing, and poetry, and callousness, and sensitivity, and many other adjectives, many contradicting the one before, and all true. With his older children, he was a fantastic father. With the younger siblings, his various illnesses had started to affect him, even before we realized it, and things in the house were different. Some of it wasn’t his fault, and some of it was. In this way, he was no different than any of us.
Whatever may have crossed his mind from time to time, he never entertained the thought of leaving his family. I’m sure he was tempted to, as who isn’t? but he had made a promise and he kept it. In my parents’ home, promises meant something. I remember my father with love and a few head-shakings, some incredulous bug-eyed “what the hells,” and a lot of forgiveness and smiling. And, a few things that I haven’t forgiven yet.
It is entirely coincidental that our readings today in class were all about parenting, specifically, fathering. Our main reading was a Newsweek essay by psychologist Christopher N. Bacorn. The reading was prefaced by these statistics:
According to the National Fatherhood Initiative, an estimated 24.7 million children (36.3 percent) do not live with their biological fathers. About 40 percent of these children have not seen their fathers during the past year. A heartbreaking number of children have never, nor will they ever, see their fathers. Many do not know who their fathers are. Many of their mothers do not know, either.
“I had seen a hundred like him. He sat back on the couch, silently staring out the window, an unmistakable air of sullen anger about him. He was 15 and big for his age. His mother, a woman in her mid-30s, sat forward on the couch and, on the edge of tears, described the boy’s heartbreaking descent into alcohol, gang membership, failing grades and violence. She was small, thin, worn out from frantic nights of worry and lost sleep waiting for him to come home. She had lost control of him, she admitted freely. Ever since his father had left, four years ago, she had had trouble with him. He had become more and more unmanageable, and then, recently, he had hurt someone in a fight. Charges had been filed, counseling recommended.
I listened to the mother’s anguished story. “Are there any men in his life?” I asked. There was no one. She had no brothers, her father was dead and her ex-husband’s father lived in another state. She looked up at me, her eyes hopeful. “Will you talk with him?” she asked. “Just speak with him about what he’s doing. Maybe if it came from a professional. . . .” she added, her voice trailing off. “It couldn’t hurt.”
I did speak with him. Maybe it didn’t hurt, but like most counseling with 15-year-old boys, it didn’t seem to help either. He denied having any problems. Everyone else had them, but he didn’t. After half an hour of futility, I gave up.
I have come to believe that most adolescent boys can’t make use of professional counseling. What a boy can use, and all too often doesn’t have, is the fellowship of men – at least one man who pays attention to him, who spends time with him, who admires him. A boy needs a man he can look up to. What he doesn’t need is a shrink.
That episode, and others like it, set me thinking about children and their fathers. As a nation, we are racked by youth violence, overrun by gangs, guns and drugs. The great majority of youthful offenders are male, most without fathers involved in their lives in any useful way. Many have never even met their fathers.
What’s become of the fathers of these boys? Where are they? Well, I can tell you where they’re not. They’re not at PTA meetings or piano recitals. They’re not teaching Sunday school. You won’t find them in the pediatrician’s office, holding a sick child. You won’t even see them in juvenile court, standing next to Junior as he awaits sentencing for burglary or assault. You might see a few of them in the supermarket, but not many. You will see a lot of women in these places – mothers and grandmothers- but you won’t see many fathers.
So, if they’re not in these places, where are the fathers? They are in diners and taverns, drinking, conversing, playing pool with other men. They are on golf courses, tennis courts, in bowling alleys, fishing on lakes and rivers. They are working in their jobs, many from early morning to late at night. Some are home watching television, out mowing the lawn or tuning up the car. In short, they are everywhere, except in the company of their children.
Of course, there are men who do spend time with children, men who are covering for all those absentee fathers. The Little League coaches, Boy Scout leaders, Big Brothers and schoolteachers who value contact with children, who are investing in the next generation, sharing time and teaching skills. And there are many fathers who are less visible but no less valuable, those who quietly help with homework, baths, laundry and grocery shopping. Fathers who read to their children, drive them to ballet lessons, who cheer at soccer games. Fathers who are on the job. These are the real men of America, the ones holding society together. Every one of them is worth a dozen investment bankers, a boardroom full of corporate executives and all of the lawmakers west of the Mississippi.
Poverty prevention: What would happen if the truant fathers of America began spending time with their children? It wouldn’t eliminate world hunger, but it might save some families from sinking below the poverty line. It wouldn’t bring peace to the Middle East, but it just might keep a few kids from trying to find a sense of belonging with their local street-corner gang. It might not defuse the population bomb, but it just might prevent a few teenage pregnancies.
If these fathers were to spend more time with their children, it just might have an effect on the future of marriage and divorce. Not only do many boys lack a sense of how a man should behave; many girls don’t know, either, having little exposure themselves to healthy male-female relationships. With their fathers around, many young women might come to expect more than the myth that a man’s chief purpose on earth is to impregnate them and then disappear. If that would happen, the next generation of absentee fathers might never come to pass.
Before her session ended, I tried to give this mother some hope. Maybe she could interest her son in a sport: how about basketball or soccer? Any positive experience involving men or other boys would expose her son to teamwork, cooperation, and friendly competition. But the boy was contemptuous of my suggestions. “Those things are for dorks,” he sneered. He couldn’t wait to leave. I looked at his mother. I could see the embarrassment and hopelessness in her face. “Let’s go, Ma,” he said, more as a command than a request. I walked her out through the waiting room, full of women and children, mostly boys, of all ages. Her son was already in the parking lot. I shook her hand. “Good luck, ” I said. “Thank you,” she replied, without conviction. As I watched her go, my heart, too, was filled with a measure of hopelessness. But anger was there too, anger at the fathers of these boys. Anger at fathers who walk away from their children, leaving them feeling confused, rejected, and full of suffering. What’s to become of boys like this? What man will take an interest in them? I can think of only one kind – a judge.”
===
Oh wait. NOW I remember why I started thinking about Dad. Somebody in the hallway passed. . . by.
. . . and my mind’s eye – ever more astute than the two regular eyes – still sees scenes like this whenever I look out the living room window in the fall.
Empty Nest Syndrome. ENS. Certifiable in all fifty states, and worse every day.
Mamacita says so.
I love you, my sweet babies.
Mamacita says: Don’t tell anybody, but I’m only pretending to be upset that all the stores are getting ready for Christmas. Yes, it’s too early. Yes, Thanksgiving really does deserve some undivided attention. Etc. The fact is, I love Christmas, and even more than Christmas, I love preparing for Christmas. This entails far more than decorations. As parents, we must also prepare the mind.
Yes, it’s too early. Far too early.
But there will always be that part of me that loves to see all the twinkling lights and all the new Christmas toys, and walk up and down displays that ask me to push buttons and watch elves that don’t look like Dobby dance. Part of me screams, “The world has gone mad, why so early?” And the rest of me answers, “Because.
I’m always so sorry for children who have to grow up in a home without wonder. I am a firm believer in nurturing a child’s imagination and encouraging active participation in worlds (plural) of fantasy. Some parents think such things only result in the child being crushed at the discovery that his parents lied to him. I don’t agree. If and when something like that happens, the parents didn’t do it right.
Little children love wonder, and the world is full of wonder, enough and more to share. NOT to share wonder is a sin.
Power. Parents have power to change a mundane day into a day of wonder. Our children’s memories depend on our willingness to use that power.
Sometimes we are so physically exhausted that it’s difficult to put out the effort. Don’t ever let yourself get caught in that trap. Once you start, it’s easy to continue.
Your children are worth the time. And so are you. Get up from that chair, get those boxes down from wherever they’re stored, and get busy. Bring some stars down from the sky and let them shine in your living room. Look at those same stars in your child’s eyes. You have the power. You can do this.
Make magic for your children.
Otherwise, they won’t know how to make magic for their own children.