No More Death, I Mean It!  (Anybody got a peanut?)

No More Death, I Mean It! (Anybody got a peanut?)

imagesMamacita says:  Every day, it seems, another icon dies.  It’s getting to the point where I am almost scared of my Twitter feeds – the letters “RIP” are appearing way too often, and they are taking my childhood with them.  They’re taking big chunks of my current life, too.

There are people who are always supposed to be there, even if they’re strangers we know only from the big screen, small screen, book covers, stage, radio. . . .  It’s getting to the point where watching a fairly recent movie wherein everybody in the cast is still alive is more and more rare.

Is this why so many television shows are killing off favorite characters faster than we can adjust our hearts to the loss, to help us cope with real people dropping off the face of the earth, no more to entertain or love us?  I’m not actually talking about people we know personally – family, friends, etc.  That is also happening at a rate faster than our hearts can take, but this post is about “celebrity” deaths that make us cry, because, in a way, we also love those who make us laugh, cry, and enjoy life more because they were there, even though these people don’t know us.

I can barely think of my beloved Madeline L’Engle without sobbing about never knowing what will happen to her characters now. . . .

I am thinking in particular of Roger Ebert and Richard Griffiths, but whenever I watch an old movie (or a new one, for that matter!) I find myself looking at the beautiful, healthy, talented people and wondering how they could possibly be dead.

Then again, maybe that’s one of the wonderful things about preserved media – it makes us all immortal.

I do have a message for all of you living people, however.  Here it is:

Don’t die.  I can’t take much more of this.

Then again, maybe I’ve just been watching too many “What’s My Line” celebrity guest shots from the 1950’s and ’60’s – so much talent, most of it gone.

Thank you, film, for preserving this talent so we can appreciate it years and years after these wonderful people have gone.

And now, I’m heading back to Tweetdeck, fingers crossed.

Also?  Hourglasses used to scare me to death when I was a child.  I think it has something to do with The Wizard of Oz.

 

No More Death, I Mean It!  (Anybody got a peanut?)

The Dangers of Dihydrogen Monoxide: Prevent a Tragedy With Science

I use this article in my classrooms every spring.  I hope you will all find it useful as well.  Information is life-saving, and this particular information contains more than one lesson for us all.  I would be most grateful, and extremely interested in any comments you will make.

=========================================

Dihydrogen Monoxide: When people do not have sufficient knowledge of science, terrible things can happen!

IX:  Deadly science in the home: be sure you know what to look for!

 

poisonEvery year, thousands of people die from exposure to dihydrogen monoxide.  Widely unreported by the media and virtually ignored by government agencies, this silent toxin remains unknown to the majority of people at risk.

 

poisonSome officials believe that dihydrogen monoxide’s deadly facts and statistics will never be fully released to the public because of government dependence on its addictive qualities; in other words, the “feel good” sensations it can deliver are blinding people to the harm it can also cause, and it’s been proven that most federal, state, and local governments are made up of people who simply can’t do without it.

 

poisonThe presence of dihydrogen monoxide has been found in schools, businesses, and even homes, and traces of it exist in many toxic chemicals such as sulfuric acid and ethyl alcohol.  Many estimates show that every home in America – if not every home in the world – contains a DHMO source, intensifying the danger of this potentially deadly and hazardous compound.

 

poisonIn addition to the dangers posed to living creatures, DHMO has caused billions of dollars worth of property and environmental damage.  The chemical compound in DHMO has been known to wipe out entire cities at record-breaking speed.

 

poisonPerhaps the most surprising aspect of dihydrogen monoxide is its wide-spread use in almost every aspect of daily life.  Research has proven that this chemical compound is used for everything from sanitizer to pesticides.  In recent years, dihydrogen monoxide has been used as a performance-enhancing supplement; in other words, athletes and potential athletes are using DHMO as an energy booster before a race or game, etc.  (the fairness and sportsmanship of this practice is being questioned, but the use of DHMO by athletes is rising yearly.)  Younger children, seeing the older athletes using DHMO freely, are imitating them in rising numbers.

 

poisonA surprising number of young parents have been seen – in public – giving children as young as 2 weeks a dose of dihydrogen monoxide in order to quiet or silence them.  One can only imagine how much DHMO these innocent babies are getting at home.

 

poisonDihydrogen monoxide is a popular, much-sought-after substance in the public schools.  Even elementary children have begged for it, right in the middle of the school day, so addicted that they’ve become unashamed in their desperate longing for a “hit.”  Little wonder, too, as we see so many adults carrying a stash of DHMO into stores and other public and private places, unable to do without a “hit” themselves.

 

poisonWhen frozen, DHMO expands to the level that can cause severe damage to people’s homes, often in the night when people are sleeping.  IN fact, DHMO can expand with such violent force that it is not possible to make a usable pipe strong enough to withstand this force.  Variations of DHMO have also been found in homemade bombs, which would use the pressure and explosive power of this compound to destroy.

 

poisonThe American Burn Association has identified DHMO as a target for a public awareness campaign regarding the dangers of the compound, as even a simple action such as heating it in a microwave can cause it to explode unexpectedly and violently, causing first and second degree burns on anyone in its path.

 

poisonDihydrogen monoxide can also cause exponential growth of mold and bacteria.  Under the right conditions, DHMO will encourage molds to grow rampantly, quickly covering surfaces and rising to toxic levels.

 

poisonEven when people are well-trained in the use of dihydrogen monoxide, accidents will inevitably happen and are more often than not fatal.  People’s failure to train their children in the proper use of DHMO will almost always result in shock/trauma at the very least, and brain damage and even death at the very worst.

 

poisonDihydrogen Monoxide is a clear and odorless liquid and is often difficult to detect; experts must be called in when a severe build-up is discovered.  It is difficult if not impossible to totally isolate our society from dihydrogen monoxide, so our survival will depend on our skill in identifying it and using it properly.

 

poisonParents, especially, are urged to secure their homes against dihydrogen monoxide misuse, as the lives and well-being of their children, as well as themselves, depend on it.

 

poisonBe cautious.  Be careful.  Most of all, BE AWARE.

 

No More Death, I Mean It!  (Anybody got a peanut?)

Dongles, Sherlock Holmes, and Stuff That’s None of My Business

DongleMamacita says:  I’ve been reading about the “dongle incident” and doing some serious thinking.    I’ve also been doing some serious head-shaking, and some equally serious wondering about where the line should be drawn between private conversation and public listening.
I don’t know about you (some of you, maybe, but definitely not all of you. . . .)  but when I’m not sure I understand something, an analogy is sometimes helpful.  Since I am “in education,” (but who isn’t?) I try to think of something well within my own understanding to help me out.
Like this:
Sometimes, teachers assume that their students have a background in cultural literacy when in fact they do not.  And sometimes, helping a student make and understand a connection between one thing and another, makes it all worthwhile.    Sometimes, teachers do not agree on what is worthwhile and what is not.
A few years ago, my sixth graders were getting ready to read a Sherlock Holmes short story: The Adventure of the Speckled Band, to be specific, which is my favorite Sherlock Holmes story.
About ten seconds into my enthusiastic introduction to the story, I realized that my students had never in all their lives even HEARD of Sherlock Holmes.  They will never be able to make that claim again, however.  I assure you.
We read the story and most of the students agreed that it was pretty cool.  Snakes.  Poisonous snakes.  Gypsies camping in the yard.  A cheetah and a baboon wandering free.  A huge powerful man given to fits of violence.  A bed, nailed to the floor.  Bending the iron rod.  Holmes, bending it back.  We discussed the physics of the iron rod; all the students, young as speckled bandthey were, knew that bending the rod in the first place required strength, and that bending it BACK required even more.  Holmes’ powers of observation fascinated the kids. Weird noises in the night.  Strange coincidences that even an 11-year-old thought off-kilter.  A bell-pull that pulled no bell.  Shared inheritances.  Screams in the night.  What’s not to love?
When we had finished, I recommended other Holmes stories, and the bell rang, and they left my room.  I sat there hoping the unit had gone as well for THEM as it did for me.
I knew it had been a good unit when I overheard a group of boys talking about it in the hallway.
“Now I know what it really means when somebody says ‘No shit, Sherlock!'”
No, I did not stop short, drag the student to the office and demand that he be punished for saying ‘shit.’  The P.E. teacher who also overheard the boys wanted to, but I asserted myself, which didn’t often happen because I am pretty much of a wuss in spite of my big talkin’ ways, and anyway, I do not believe in jumping on kids when their conversation was not directed towards me.  Eavesdroppers often hear negative things, and if they would mind their own business, it wouldn’t be such a big deal.  (I am not referring to inappropriate remarks specifically aimed at a non-invited listener with the intent of upsetting, insulting, or otherwise involving said uninvited listener, mind you; I am talking about private conversations that happen to be overheard and sometimes taken personally when no personal involvement is intended.)
I figured that we were eavesdropping on those boys, and that whatever they said to each other in their supposed privacy (unless it was about bombs or threats or clues about who TP’d the restroom or whispers of abuse, etc.) was their business, not ours. Kids deserve some respect.
The other teacher walked off in a huff, carefully, so the corncob wouldn’t fall out.  I smiled at the boys and said, “That’s right, guys.”
Knowledge is power.  Education is all about connections.  And that, as far as I was concerned, was a legitimate connection.
And that is why I think too much was made of the “dongle incident.”  This is also why I do not call a flash drive of any kind a “dongle.”  If I told my students to insert their dongles into the drive, I’d be disappointed if I didn’t get some laughter.  The word “dongle” is funny enough all by itself, and funnier in ANY kind of context.
Too many people take too many things far too seriously these days.  It takes our attention away from REALLY serious things, and THAT, my dear readers, is why so many important things are circling the drain while others, not nearly as important or serious, are getting so much attention.
Taking offense at someone else’s private conversation?  Please.  Was the conversation repellent?  Yes.  Sexist?  Yes.  Anyone’s business other than the two men speaking to each other?  No, it wasn’t.
Should we all try to be kind, considerate, discrete, careful what we say, and mindful of our surroundings when we say it?  Of course we should.
Does it ever happen that eavesdroppers do not hear what they’d like to hear?  That’s been a truism for hundreds of years.  “Eavesdroppers never hear any good of themselves.”
Were these men wrong in having this kind of conversation in public and loudly enough to be overheard?  Yes.  Was this woman wrong in making a huge public deal out of it INSTEAD OF trying to deal with it, at least at first, more quietly?  Yes. Don’t get me wrong; I think the men were indiscrete, but I also think the woman overreacted.  And I think the conversation was gross, but other people’s conversations – if they’re discrete – are none of my business.
Could this whole incident have been handled more wisely?  No shit, Sherlock.
Let’s all try to use our brains a little more, and our sense of context a little more, and our “I’m offended” a little less.  There are too many genuinely important issues out there; we must not allow ourselves to be influenced by, let alone offended by, an overheard conversation not even intended for the eavesdropper’s ear.
Rise above it.  Overcome it.  Be better than it.  Don’t give it any attention.
I do not want to live to see the Kardashians win.

I am Mamacita. Accept no substitutes!

Hitting the fan like no one else can...

Creative Commons License
Scheiss Weekly by Jane Goodwin (Mamacita) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License.